Jump to content

Talk:Mikhail Trepashkin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Official Russian POV is not presented. mikka (t) 05:06, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Letters from Trepashkin and Galina Starovoitova

[edit]

This is probably a speculation, but it is now clear for what reason Galina Starovoitova was assassinated (see article about Litvinenko). Mikhail Trepashkin tells the following in his letters from the prison [1]. "Litvinenko and others bravely came forward to tell the truth about FSB, but nobody supported us. Where are you, democratic forces of Russia? I am sitting in the prison wrongly accussed for 4 years, and no one helps me. " (this is not translation but summary). Galina Starovoitova was a kind of person who would never let them down. She would make a huge international story of it using her personal international connections. Therefore, it was an imperative for FSB to kill her as quickly as possible. It would be important to learn what she did during last three days of her life.


Don't mean to upset anyone, but as the writer says, the above paragraph is SPECULATION !!!, and therefore falls well within WP:OR and WP:POV. Additionally, if the Russian state and its agencies are so bad, why did they not kill Trepahkin? or "dissappear" him? Back in Stalin's day there were lots of ways - "Heart attacks" (this was even the official cause of death of Stalin's wife, whose is generally thought to have shot herself), "Road accidents" etc. etc.Mariya Oktyabrskaya (talk) 03:06, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another biased article

[edit]

This is yet another distressing attempt by certain wikipedians to make thier opinions seem like fact. I think this article is implying that MTis a tourtured po0litical prisoner, who was jailed due to his belife in the 1999 apt. bombing conspiracy. It must be reworded QZXA2 16:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If there are personal opinions of wikipediands, which are not supported by sources, this represents original research. Please tell what exactly segments of text do you mean, and how exactly these segments should be changed.Biophys 17:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So, I am waiting for your explanation which exactly statements in this article violate WP:NPOV policy.Biophys 00:05, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
His recent interview: Agents 'asked me to betray Litvinenko' Mark Franchetti, The Sunday Times, December 9, 2007 [2]Biophys (talk) 07:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trepashkin about murder of Litvinenko

[edit]

Бывший сотрудник ФСБ Михаил Трепашкин передал из колонии корреспонденту The New Times письмо, в котором сообщил о том, что ФСБ предлагала ему участвовать в операции, направленной против Александра Литвиненко.

оригинал письма находится в распоряжении редакции, его стилистика не изменена

Что именно хотели узнать у Вас британские следователи, и что Вы готовы были им сообщить?

Следователям Скотленд-Ярда я готов был сообщить то, что описываю Вам, но более детально, подробно, с увязкой на свидетелей и другие доказательства. Уверен, что на воле я мог подобрать много конкретных доказательств уже не подготовки, а по убийству Литвиненко А.В.!.. Вам я изложил немало той информации, которая еще не сообщалась никому.

Когда Вы предупреждали Литвиненко о грозящей ему опасности физического устранения?

Я предупреждал Литвиненко о грозящей ему опасности физического устранения до моего ареста (в 2003 году. — The New Times). Из двух источников (от ФСБ) мне еще в 2002—2003 годах стало известно о том, что создана группа для физического уничтожения Литвиненко А.В., Фельштинского Ю.Г. (как авторов книг «ФСБ взрывает Россию» и «Лубянская преступная группировка»), Березовского Б.А. и их близкого окружения... Полковник ФСБ РФ Шебалин В.В., служивший вместе с Литвиненко А.В. в сверхсекретном подразделении УРПО ФСБ РФ, после бегства Литвиненко в Лондон заявил, что он через знакомых среди руководителей ФСБ РФ снова восстановил сотрудничество с УСБ ФСБ РФ и начал работать против Литвиненко и Березовского, чтобы добиться реабилитации за участие в пресс-конференции в «Интерфаксе» 17 ноября 1998 года (Шебалин — это человек в маске)... Это было в августе 2002 года. Тогда же он просил у меня адреса и телефоны родственников Литвиненко, проживающих в районе Бирюлево. До этого он же просил меня съездить в Лондон (от имени ФСБ РФ) и узнать: где проживает Литвиненко, где работает, где встречается со знакомыми. Я отказался от предложения работать против Литвиненко. Думаю, что мне готовили ту роль, которую выполнили в 2006 году Луговой, Ковтун и Соколенко. Я сомневаюсь, что убийство было их инициативой.

Кто были те люди, о которых Вы предупредили Александра Литвиненко? Как я понял со слов Шебалина В.В., это была какая-то еще группа ФСБ РФ, создание которой санкционировалось на самом высоком уровне. В нее включали как действующих, так и бывших сотрудников спецслужб.

Почему, на Ваш взгляд (как профессионального контрразведчика), была избрана столь сложная схема устранения, оставившая следы чуть ли не по всей Европе? Я думаю, что это небрежность в работе исполнителя и намерение организатора умертвить исполнителей заодно с Литвиненко, а также его семью, Березовского и Закаева (пока спохватятся). Возможно, что исполнители не знали о возможных для окружения и себя последствиях. Думаю, что был расчет на то, что причину смерти именно от полония не установят. Выводы Вы сами можете сделать. Но добавлю следующее. Еще в 2001 году, когда я первый раз по просьбе Шебалина (от имени ФСБ РФ, как он пояснял) позвонил Литвиненко в Лондон, спросил, будет ли он писать новую книгу, где и кем работает, и он ответил, что якобы разносит по утрам почту, то через какое-то время Шебалин высказался, что хорошо было бы послать ему (Литвиненко) письмо с порошком. Тогда много писали про подобные письма в США.

С уважением, М.И. Трепашкин. 27 января 2007 года. ФГУ ИК-13, гор. Нижний Тагил.

Source: [3]. Most surprising here is mentioning of 2001 anthrax attack.Biophys (talk) 04:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

[edit]

Removed Military History tag as article is out of scope --dashiellx (talk) 12:16, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dodgy dates.

[edit]

The article says that the Moscow bombings were a trigger for the 2nd Chechen war. But the wiki page on that war says it started before the Moscow bombings.
Can both be right?
Mariya Oktyabrskaya (talk) 02:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, the exact wording was once edited by me, as well as other freaks. As a political freak, I can't say it's historically correct. Sorry. Try to do it better. ellol (talk) 15:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further Trepashkin's activities

[edit]

Does anyone follow Trepashkin's activities after he was released? A recent news says he was to be a lawyer in the case of Yuliya Privedennaya: [4]. Is he a practicing lawyer now? ellol (talk) 15:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone got any good sources? - this article seems to be based on very little fact indeed.

[edit]

of the five sources at the end of the article, two are from an interview with the Mr Trepashkin - hardly likely to be peer-reviewed and balanced?
And as this is the English language (!) site of Wikipedia, how about some sources more generally readable/checkable to the viewer.
I seem to remember that Mr Lenin said the control of the press was an important part of the struggle.
This article seems to be to heavy in Trepashkin/Berezovsky derived sources/links, such as sources such as 4 of the 5 sources (I'm checking the Chechen one (the 5th) out shortly), and the first of the links (although that on its website gives no indication that Mr Berezovsky is funding it, but a google search suggests that he most definitely is.
So what we seem to have is a propoganda piece riddled with unverifiable claims from Mr Trepahkin, backed up by Mr Berezovsky's financial muscle.
The only reason I don't delete the lot is that it would morally oblige me to write a better article, and I don't have the time at the momentMariya Oktyabrskaya (talk) 11:09, 17 August 2008 (UTC) How about this for a Lenin quote which seems particularly apt for this article:[reply]
In practice the capitalists and the profiteers own nine-tenths of the mediaMariya Oktyabrskaya (talk) 11:23, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Axisglobe: Former FSB officer Trepashkin among European Parliament

[edit]

[5]. Grey Fox (talk) 18:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WoE: No Terrorist Act in Post-Soviet Russia Has Ever Been Fully Inve

[edit]

[6] Grey Fox (talk) 00:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

There is recently seems to be an edit war about inclusion of a number of external links. Below is my opinion on the matter.

Link to the official site has to be included per Wikipedia:EL#What_to_link. Links to a piece of his prose and to a video showing his interview. Provide relevant and accurate description of how he looks like and what his writings are about but they could not be included per copyright reasons. They are valid links per WP:EL. The different appeals of human rights organizations is somehow a grey zone. I have used them as sources for the reaction of the human rights organizations. I have removed dead links that might be not valid ELs anyway Alex Bakharev (talk) 06:29, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Offliner, once again, please explain your deletions of links. Thanks, Biophys (talk) 20:32, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of sourced and relevant text

[edit]

Why did you delete this [7]?. Biophys (talk) 03:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is an obsolete claim. Obviously, no such assassination attempt on Felshtinsky has been made, so the claim was either a lie or simply just wrong. Offliner (talk) 03:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The source tells the assassination was planned. An information about planning the assassination of a notable person is important.Biophys (talk) 03:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So, you are removing everything again, without even talking...Biophys (talk) 03:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, this is a notable claim.Biophys (talk) 00:43, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree, as explained above. Offliner (talk) 01:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mikhail Trepashkin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Mikhail Trepashkin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mikhail Trepashkin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mikhail Trepashkin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mikhail_Trepashkin&oldid=1210003121"